Enlarge/Change font size hereA A A
I was reading RPI and I came across this article about What Labour are offering and how it may screw over tenants written by Rosalind Renshaw.
Ed Miliband’s targeting of the private tenant vote in front of the general election wasn’t apparently surprising at all. In the end 9,000,000 prospective voters have their homes in the PRS – more than the SRS. No doubt his premise is that if a Labour Proclamation can pledge private tenants something, it will obtain rewards in the polling booths.
But will it?
Labour wants to bring back discredited rent controls. Despite the fact the party denies that will be the situation and that it will at most propose a ‘mechanism’ to cap rent, that looks a lot like rent controls.
“Some Landlords will not like this, but millions of tenants will” said Milliband.
Labour will also contribute by adding 3-year tenancies as the omission pattern. These lengthy tenancies would give the tenant more security, and make the evictions harder. Upfront fees to be charged to tenants would be made illegal by a Labour government. Credit checks would be a limited exception; anyhow, the tenant would have to be refunded if the checks were passed and the tenancy went ahead.
What are landlords supposed to think? Rents have hardly risen, and by much less than expansion – and that is on the Government’s figures. So, Labour appear to be organizing policy on a colossal misinterpretation.
As for rent caps, the past shows they don’t work. Brought out in WW1 in 1915 as a ‘temporary’ measure, they weren’t stamped out until the 1980s when the authority was Margaret Thatcher. Throughout those years Britain’s stock – and quality – of private rented housing declined, because landlords saw no potential of a return on their investment. But it is maybe the 3-year default tenancy and the larger predicament in repossession that brings up the most concern for landlords.
Why would a home owner, for example, posted abroad to be employed for a few years, want to rent out his house? Previously, he would have leaped at the chance of becoming an ‘accidental landlord’, but under Labour’s plans, really?
Labour’s proposals are thought to be very intentional by some. We view them as merely contemptuous. However, we also think they’ll backfire badly, discouraging landlords and discharging generous amounts of stock from the market.
Labour says confidently that they’re helping to solve Britain’s housing crisis, where as we can all agree that these proposals would merely remove more roofs over people’s heads.
I'd be interested to hear people's opinions...
Government interference with commercial organisations rarely works. Perhaps the government shoud first attack the cause of the present crisis, itself and the banks.
It will never work. Labour seem to forget that to house all of these tenants, they need the housing stock in the first place, via the PRS. If its not attractive, or worth their while, landlords will sell up.
Back to square one.
Leave it alone Millibland.
Idon't know the small print but i assume the tenant can leave when he likes but the LL is handcuffed?
If silly Ed gets in I will just ignore any rent controls;they can try and stop me; but won't succeed.
I have things set up so I am untraceable.
Technically I don't rent anywhere apart from 2 properties which won't be above any rent control.
The tenant will have a choice of paying the rent required irrespective of any rent control.
Or rooms will be let out to give more than the whole normal rent.
So I could rent a flat with licenced AST's to give more than the normal whole flat rent which would be within the rent control amounts for a 1 bed; but gives the LL more than a whole flat rent!!
A very silly idea by SILLY BILLY ED!!
Most Users Ever Online: 755
Currently Browsing this Page:
Mary Latham: 2194
David Price: 1700
DATA CONTROL: 979
Guest Posters: 2634
Newest Members:nowthen, wattutilities, bill, mrpgriffin, khaa1329, stefan
Moderators: News @ Tenant Referencing: 1636, laura: 15, Chloe: 107, lucybarr: 0, jaswhite: 20
Administrators: Paul Routledge: 3433