Enlarge/Change font size here
A A ABuyers of new homes will be able to borrow up to 95% of their value as part of plans David Cameron says will help get "Britain building again".
The mortgage indemnity scheme, in which the government will underwrite part of the risk to lenders, could help up to 100,000 people in England.
It is part of a wider strategy to build more homes and boost home ownership.
Labour said it was "too little, too late" and did not compensate for earlier cuts to housing budgets.
Building more homes is one of the government's economic priorities, with the number of new ones being built at its lowest level since World War II, and with rents and prices remaining high while mortgage lending is restricted.
Just 121,200 new homes were made available in 2010-11, half of what ministers say are needed...
full story continued here...
As a landlord / letting agent / home-owner /tenant we would love to hear from you and what you think about these latest plans from the government.
Here at LandlordReferencing.co.uk we can confidently say that with demand for more housing = our services will be even more valuable to good landlords, letting agents & tenants in the very near future.
Senior PR Officer at TenantReferencingUK.com & Admin at NLCEuk.co.uk .
Any queries email me at:
samii@landlordreferencing.co.uk / samii.boydprice@nlceuk.co.uk or give me a call on: 0800 9994 994 (option 6).
Yes 95 loan will be sold rabbit hutches by developers again uk government just full of **** ******* **** **** ******** ******* ***** **** **** **** ***** ******* ********* ******** *** **** ****** ********** ************ **** *********** ************* all money making ideas
The government has gotten themselves in such a deep hole that scaffolding could not help them get out of it. It is fine and dandy to say that building more houses will get first time buyers moving again but the houses will have to be quite cheap for them to afford it.
Now this means that all the current houses for sale on the market in the private market will be stuck as they are already in negative equity because of the fall in house prices so cannot afford to reduce their prices to compete with the ones being built to be affordable for first time buyers. So if you try to relieve one end you are making the other suffer; hence not getting us anywhere, more like "SLIGHT OF HAND" tactics to make the public actually think they are doing something proactive.
If they really want to help rather than getting first time buyers into the biggest debt they will probably ever have: how about getting them out of debt and into work as people at the moment are struggling for jobs especially in the first time buyer price range...??
Dean
Most Users Ever Online: 755
Currently Online:
8 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
PaulBarrett: 2902
Mary Latham: 2194
LyndonBaker: 1805
David Price: 1700
Patricia: 1054
DATA CONTROL: 979
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2635
Members: 6869
Moderators: 5
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 3
Topics: 4691
Posts: 31584
Newest Members:
saimlim, dsjow, pear223, jana, benditoadonis, monstercleaningModerators: News @ Tenant Referencing: 1636, laura: 15, Chloe: 107, lucybarr: 0, jaswhite: 20
Administrators: Paul Routledge: 3433